Treadmill vs Outdoor Running: What the Science Actually Says
A deep dive into the research on treadmill running—energy cost, biomechanics, the 1% incline myth, and how to get the most from your indoor training.
If you've spent any time on a treadmill, you've probably wondered: is this really the same as running outside? Does that mile on the belt count the same as a mile on the road?
The short answer: yes, with some nuances worth understanding. But the conventional wisdom you've heard—like "set the incline to 1% to simulate outdoor running"—isn't as straightforward as most runners think.
Let's look at what decades of research actually tells us about treadmill running, and how you can use that knowledge to train smarter.
The Physics: Why Treadmill Running Should Be Different
From a pure physics standpoint, running on a treadmill eliminates one variable that matters outdoors: air resistance.
When you run outside, you're constantly pushing through air. Even on a calm day with no wind, you're displacing air molecules as you move forward. This costs energy—and the faster you run, the more energy it costs, since air resistance increases with the square of your velocity.
On a treadmill, you stay in roughly the same position relative to the room. The air isn't moving past you (unless you're in front of a fan), so there's no resistance to overcome.
This is the foundation of the famous "1% incline rule." But before we get there, let's understand what the research has actually measured.
The 1% Incline Rule: Where It Came From
In 1996, researchers Andrew Jones and Jonathan Doust from the University of Brighton published a landmark study in the Journal of Sports Sciences. They had nine trained male runners complete runs at six different speeds (ranging from about 6:30/mile to 5:00/mile pace) on a treadmill at 0%, 1%, 2%, and 3% grades, and also outdoors on a flat road.
Their key finding: at most speeds, oxygen consumption during road running wasn't significantly different from treadmill running at a 1% grade. At 0% grade, the treadmill was easier. At 2% and 3%, it was harder.
The conclusion seemed simple: set your treadmill to 1% and you'll match the energy cost of outdoor running.
This study launched a rule that's been repeated in running magazines, gym posters, and training guides for nearly 30 years. But here's what most people missed in the fine print.
The Nuance: Speed Matters
Air resistance doesn't affect all paces equally. At slower speeds, it's nearly negligible. At faster speeds, it becomes significant.
The Jones & Doust study found that at their two slowest speeds (around 8:00-9:00/mile pace), there was no significant difference between outdoor running and treadmill running at 0% grade. The 1% adjustment only became necessary at faster paces.
So if you're doing easy runs at 9:00/mile or slower, the 1% rule may actually be overcorrecting. You might be working slightly harder than necessary.
Conversely, if you're doing tempo work at 6:00/mile, 1% might not be quite enough. At very fast paces, 1.5-2% may better approximate outdoor effort.
The Plot Twist: More Recent Research
Here's where it gets interesting. In 2019, a comprehensive meta-analysis by Miller et al. published in Sports Medicine looked at 34 studies comparing treadmill and outdoor running. The researchers combined data from all of these studies to get a clearer picture.
Their finding: at submaximal speeds, oxygen consumption was only slightly lower on a treadmill at 0% grade—an average difference of just 0.55 ml/kg/min, which was not statistically significant.
In other words, for most recreational runners running at conversational paces, there may be no meaningful difference between treadmill running at 0% and outdoor running on flat ground.
The original Jones & Doust study was one of only two studies in the meta-analysis that found significantly lower oxygen consumption on a treadmill at 0%. The majority of other studies found no significant difference.
This doesn't mean the 1% rule is wrong—it means it's probably more relevant for faster runners and high-intensity workouts than for everyday easy runs.
Biomechanics: How Your Body Moves Differently
A 2020 systematic review by Van Hooren et al., also in Sports Medicine, analyzed 33 studies comparing the biomechanics of treadmill versus outdoor running. Their conclusion: most outcome measures are "largely comparable" between conditions.
However, they did find some consistent differences:
- Contact time: Slightly longer on treadmill (~5ms)
- Vertical displacement: Less bounce on treadmill (~1.5cm less)
- Peak propulsive force: Lower on treadmill
- Foot angle at footstrike: More horizontal on treadmill (~10° difference)
The reduced propulsive force makes sense: on a treadmill, the belt assists your leg moving backward under your body. You don't have to "push off" quite as hard because the belt is already moving in that direction.
These differences are real, but they're relatively small. For most training purposes, what you do on the treadmill transfers well to outdoor running.
The Belt Speed Problem
One often-overlooked factor: treadmill belt speed isn't constant.
Research has shown that when your foot strikes the belt, the motor is loaded and the belt slows temporarily. During the flight phase, the motor speeds up to compensate. A 2021 study in Scientific Reports found that belt speed can vary by more than 5% of target speed during stance phase, and average belt speeds varied between 98% and 103% of the displayed speed depending on the treadmill.
This means two things:
- Your actual pace may differ slightly from what the display shows
- Heavier runners experience more belt deceleration during footstrike
Commercial gym treadmills with powerful motors handle this better than budget home treadmills. If your treadmill pace seems "off" compared to outdoor running, belt speed variation could be a factor.
Using Incline Strategically
The energy cost of incline running follows a well-documented curve. Research by Minetti et al. (2002) established the metabolic costs across grades from -45% to +45%.
Key findings from this and related research:
- Energy cost increases roughly linearly with positive grade above 15%
- Running at a 10% incline costs roughly 2.5x the energy of flat running
- Downhill running is most efficient at about -10% to -20% grade
- Steeper downhills actually become more costly due to braking forces
This data is what powers Grade Adjusted Pace (GAP) calculations in apps like Strava. Understanding these relationships can help you design effective incline workouts on the treadmill.
Practical Guidelines for Treadmill Training
Based on the research, here's how to approach treadmill running:
For Easy Runs (9:00/mile or slower)
Run at 0% grade. The energy difference is negligible at these paces, and adding incline may push you out of your easy zone.
For Moderate Runs (7:00-9:00/mile)
Consider 0.5-1% grade. This range is where the 1% rule becomes relevant but isn't always necessary.
For Fast Workouts (sub-7:00/mile)
Use 1-2% grade. Air resistance becomes more significant at faster paces, so this adjustment better matches outdoor effort.
For Racing Simulations
Match the expected race conditions. Training for a flat road race? Keep it at 0-1%. Training for a hilly course? Build incline intervals into your workouts.
Calculate Your Exact Conversion
Rather than memorizing guidelines or squinting at a chart, you can get precise conversions for any pace and incline. Our Treadmill Pace Calculator uses pace-dependent conversion data to show you:
- The exact incline needed to match outdoor effort at your specific pace
- What your treadmill workout translates to in outdoor terms
- How different incline settings change the equivalent outdoor pace
This accounts for the research showing that faster paces need more incline adjustment, while slower paces may need none at all.
The Perception Factor
There's one more variable the research consistently shows: treadmill running feels harder than the physiology would suggest.
Studies have found that runners tend to perceive treadmill running as faster than it actually is. In one study, participants asked to match their outdoor self-selected pace chose significantly slower treadmill speeds.
This psychological component is real. The monotony of indoor running, the lack of visual motion cues, and perhaps the fear of flying off the back all contribute to making the treadmill feel harder than an equivalent outdoor run.
Don't fight this. If the treadmill feels harder, it's okay to run slightly slower than your outdoor pace at the same effort level.
The Bottom Line
Treadmill running is a legitimate training tool. The differences from outdoor running are real but smaller than most people think.
The key takeaways:
- The 1% rule is a reasonable approximation for moderate-to-fast paces, but not necessary for easy running
- Biomechanics are largely similar between treadmill and outdoor running
- Belt speed accuracy varies by treadmill quality
- Perceived effort may be higher on a treadmill—that's normal
- A mile is still a mile, whether it's on a belt or on the road
The best treadmill workout is the one you actually do. If it keeps you running when weather, darkness, or logistics would otherwise stop you, it's worth the minor differences.
Ready to dial in your treadmill training?
Use our free Treadmill Pace Calculator to convert any pace between treadmill and outdoor equivalents.
Open Treadmill CalculatorReferences
Jones, A. M., & Doust, J. H. (1996). A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. Journal of Sports Sciences, 14(4), 321-327.
Miller, J. R., Van Hooren, B., Bishop, C., Buckley, J. D., Willy, R. W., & Fuller, J. T. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of crossover studies comparing physiological, perceptual and performance measures between treadmill and overground running. Sports Medicine, 49(5), 763-782.
Van Hooren, B., Fuller, J. T., Buckley, J. D., Miller, J. R., Sewell, K., Rao, G., ... & Willy, R. W. (2020). Is motorized treadmill running biomechanically comparable to overground running? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-over studies. Sports Medicine, 50(4), 785-813.
Minetti, A. E., Moia, C., Roi, G. S., Susta, D., & Ferretti, G. (2002). Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. Journal of Applied Physiology, 93(3), 1039-1046.
Willems, P. A., et al. (2021). A new method for measuring treadmill belt velocity fluctuations: effects of treadmill type, body mass and locomotion speed. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-12.